Villains are
so interesting to us because they are bad. They make us fear that tipping
point, because at some point or another Villain is good, something along the
course of their life drastically changes them, and causes them to become evil.
I believe that as a society we are attracted to their evil, because it keeps us
on our toes, it cause us to ask ourselves, “ what’s my tipping point?” it makes
us scared yet excited that any moment of any day a small event could cause us
to become that evil person. Take my favorite villain Lord Voldemort he is so
evil that he wants to wipe out an entire population just because their blood
isn’t pure. Now yes that is evil and when reading the books I makes you against
him, but before Voldemort was evil he was Tom Riddle an intelligent and very
powerful wizard. At the end of the series there is a scene between Voldemort
and Harry where Harry is accused of being just like voldemort, - in that
instance as a reader you see the line to be there the line that keeps it
distinct the thing that attracts us to villains because this moment you’re on
the edge of the seat franticly wondering if harry is truly capable of being
evil?- It’s not until Harry answers the question that you know he is good, that
is the only difference is love Harry has and can love and voldemort has lost
this power. That’s something that has happened to all villains they have lost
the ability to love. That what makes them evil, and because for us as a society
Love is so important the mere absence of it could cause us to become Evil.
A Readers Rendezvous
Friday, March 1, 2013
Book 3 Project
Literary Hero
In Nicholas Sparks book Safe Haven, the protagonist of the story is not the Hero. This is because the story is about a girl in her late twenties who moves to the small town of Southport, North Carolinian in attempts to leave her past, behind her running away from an abusive husband, starting from scratch. Kate tries her best to keep to herself and cruse by unnoticed. She is the protagonist but because her main goal is to just go by unnoticed, not fight her previous life, but instead just escape it, she is not the hero of the story the hero needs to stand up for something. Because of this the hero in Safe Haven is actually a supporting character - Alex.
To be more specific Alex is a modern-slightly-epic Hero. Alex is a modern hero because he is fighting the mental battle, of his past. His wife died several years ago, he’s left to juggle raising kids, and owning a store at the same time. He goes through the struggle of keeping his kids happy and preoccupied always worrying about them. On top of all of this he worries about Katie. He notices that “ as she was debating what to buy . . . the fingers of her right hand twisting around her left ring finger, toying with a ring that wasn’t there. The gesture triggered something both familiar and long forgotten.” (Sparks 48). This on moment shows his heroism, because besides all of his struggles and all of the people that come through the store, the one girl that wants to go unnoticed he notices her, he recognizes that she has had a troubling relationship in the past and amongst all of this he wants to care for her an notice her. He is a modern hero because he selflessly cares for others, being there for them never letting his past or own problems get in the way.
Alex however is an Epic hero because he cares for Katie and his kids. He is unselfish and brave saving Katie from her past, allowing her- instead of running from it- to become aware and accepting of it. Becoming a comforter for her promising to always be there for her telling her “I’m not perfect either, so maybe it’s best if we take all of this one day at a time. And when you’re ready, if you’re ever ready, I’ll be waiting.” (130). This action may not be considered heroic when compared to actually hero’s like Odysseus. But to Kate being there for her at all times, waiting for her even when she may never come is exactly, what Kate needs. This one gesture is saving Kate from her past allowing her truly start anew. Because of all of this Alex is a Hero.
Reflection 9
Edge of the seat moments from Safe Haven:
Katie wasn't aware of when it had happend, but she realized that Jo had taken her hand and she was no longer watching her self from across the room. She could tast the salt on her lips and imagined that her soul was leaking out. " (66)
- When Alex and Katie first trust each other and become friends. In this secen Alexs son Josh falls into the creek behind Alex's story and is drownding.The suddeness of this sceen cause your heart to beat and for you to be as scared as Alex is. Making this scence a edge of a seat one.
- The next moment is when katie is describing "her friends"( really its Katies) past to Jo. This is the first time that Katie has opend up to anyone about her self, and because of the serousness of the past and this scene it makes you feel right on the edge of your seat wanting to comfert her.
Katie wasn't aware of when it had happend, but she realized that Jo had taken her hand and she was no longer watching her self from across the room. She could tast the salt on her lips and imagined that her soul was leaking out. " (66)
- The next moment is When Alex and Katie have finally accepted one another Alex, told katie in the past scen that he knew of her abusive past, and that he only waited until she was ready to talk. This moment after Katie felt scared and he was there patiencently waiting for her. This scene puts me on the edge of the sceat, because its so perfect and still i feel that sparks is alowing me to peak into this small and perfect moment in their ever cachotic lives.
Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Tuesday, February 5, 2013
Book 2 Reflection 3
I would
say the genera of “Sign of Four” are strongly sorted into being a mystery
genus. The subgenera’s is simply a general mystery. The book is filled with
mystery of- just put simply- “who done it? “In the story Sherlock Holmes has to
solve the mystery of how someone was murdered in a completely locked room,
which is leaving behind the message of The Sign of Four and what does that sign
of four even mean. What also makes this a mystery is that Holmes must put
together clues to solve the case. For example, the clues of a change in
handwriting lead him to the crimes scene. He uses skills of trickery and
deduction to solve the crime, for example after Watson and Sherlock had found
who the suspect was, he used a dog to find out where the suspect went after committing
the crime, he then noticed that the trailed stopped at a marina, and that he
was obviously on a boat. He then asked a nearby child if he had seen a man, the
child then informed him that he left on the Aurora. Sherlock then manipulated
the situation (as seen in many mysteries, to get more information about the
crime) telling the boy that he knew of such a boat was it still blue with white
strips? The boy (not knowing Sherlock was just guessing the descriptions) told
him the correct color and look of the boat allowing Sherlock to then further
fallow the suspect.
Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Reflection 7
I agree with the point David Shields is trying to make
through his book. I see him being the author of the book because he arranged
the book into ideas. Even though the specifics of his ideas were from different
people the arrangement and logic was his. Think about this when you write a paper
you tend to cite then information that’s new or something that you do not already
know, however there is stuff in that paper that is “Common knowledge” that
people tend to already know that seem to be your idea. You wouldn’t take the
time to site where you got that Idea from, even though a good chance is that
that idea originated through a teacher or person around you. For example if I were
to write a paper saying: Democracy was
first founded by the ancient Greeks as a system that represents people however today
we know that democracy is a government that “fairly and freely”(government
book) represents people. In ancient Greece it was more the wealthy men who were
represented. The idea that the Greeks
were the first people to have a democracy was not an idea that popped into my
head, no it was something taught to me and after a while it just became a fact I
know. Then new Idea was something taught to me as well but more recently. I
sight the book because it’s a new idea and
do not site the teacher or book that taught me a bout Greeks because it’s
common knowledge. What’s wrong with that? In my opinion nothing. Over time
something one person may know is spread and you don’t have to site it that’s what
David Shields is saying that all of the ideas he took from people but his usage
makes it his words because of how he’s using them, in my paper I don’t have to
site the source that about the Greeks because I rearranged it to be my own
idea. That’s how is see non-fiction vs. Fiction, we don’t need to label something
non-fiction or fiction because a non-fiction book could be not 100% your ideas
or actions making it fiction, parts of it could be exaterated to hold a better
story, that’s all. You could take a fiction work like Nicolas sparks and say that’s
my story the note book is my wife’s actual story, and yet it’s still considered
fiction. If titles were eliminated then people could better enjoy books, and
not worry about picking out the truths.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)