Reflection 7

I agree with the point David Shields is trying to make through his book. I see him being the author of the book because he arranged the book into ideas. Even though the specifics of his ideas were from different people the arrangement and logic was his. Think about this when you write a paper you tend to cite then information that’s new or something that you do not already know, however there is stuff in that paper that is “Common knowledge” that people tend to already know that seem to be your idea. You wouldn’t take the time to site where you got that Idea from, even though a good chance is that that idea originated through a teacher or person around you. For example if I were to write a paper saying: Democracy was first founded by the ancient Greeks as a system that represents people however today we know that democracy is a government that “fairly and freely”(government book) represents people. In ancient Greece it was more the wealthy men who were represented.  The idea that the Greeks were the first people to have a democracy was not an idea that popped into my head, no it was something taught to me and after a while it just became a fact I know. Then new Idea was something taught to me as well but more recently. I sight the book because it’s a new idea and   do not site the teacher or book that taught me a bout Greeks because it’s common knowledge. What’s wrong with that? In my opinion nothing. Over time something one person may know is spread and you don’t have to site it that’s what David Shields is saying that all of the ideas he took from people but his usage makes it his words because of how he’s using them, in my paper I don’t have to site the source that about the Greeks because I rearranged it to be my own idea. That’s how is see non-fiction vs. Fiction, we don’t need to label something non-fiction or fiction because a non-fiction book could be not 100% your ideas or actions making it fiction, parts of it could be exaterated to hold a better story, that’s all. You could take a fiction work like Nicolas sparks and say that’s my story the note book is my wife’s actual story, and yet it’s still considered fiction. If titles were eliminated then people could better enjoy books, and not worry about picking out the truths.

Reflection 6

The genera I read depend on what I am doing. When I was little I would mainly read magic realism, and fantasy novels. I think I choose to read those novels because I could be transported of to a land that was somewhat like hours but also at times impossible for anyone else but me to go there. I found that I could become who ever I wanted to be and not worry about the outside world. As I got older I have begun to stray away from these genera’s reading dystopian fictions, reading books like the “Hunger Games” and “Matched”. I think that the older I got these alternate universes added a bit of thrill causing me to think what if our society became like that? What if I was like this person? How would I react? Then in the summers I now read completely different genera, I read more realistic fiction. Books that seem to coincide with my life allowing me to see it in a different view, or in the case of my summer series, “the Au Paris” it allowed me to step away from a summer of work and imagine/ enjoy the life on the beach enjoying the girls lives without really experiencing all the drama they experienced. On A whole I feel that I cannot always liable this year I was only this genera and during the summers that one. I read an assortment of genera’s on a whole, it’s just depends on my personality during that part of my life will make one genera come up more often in the books I select.

Book 2 Review 2

My book does not ha e a cover, the hardback version on all the copies I looked through were just a fancy define and nothing more. As for the online version I have of It is just a black and white picture of two men ( presumably Sherlock and Watson ) standing investigating something. as. I look through the online. Library. I find similar covers on all of them a little tweak on who's on the cover and the angle of the pic.( is it just sherlock or a chair with some one in it ? Is it his whole body or just a face ?) Each online cover is different and each I do not like. Not because the pictures do not fit the book, I mean it is  about  Sherlock Holmes. However, I find no "cover" to be best. The Book was written in the eighteen hundreds. A time where more people read not based of the look of the book but more for the past time and enjoyment of reading they didn't need to be drawing into the book by flashing colors and pictures as we need to day. I fell that with out a cover the book is simple and left to be a good story, nothing more. With the picture that the publishing companies are putting on it, they are doing little respect for the book, they are taking ( what my books says to be 1600) pages and Turing the wonderful amount of entertainment and adventure into a meaningless picture of two guys "investigating something" you just can't sum up a two hounded year old series into so that. no a blank cover. Induces the. Main genera and reason of the book. mystery.
A variaty of covers: 

 

                                                

Book 2 Review 1

I would say. The specific challenges the director would have trouble incorporating was Dr. Watsons view point since its is in first person the story is written  and every thing we see is in his eyes. The movie would need to incorporate his point of view as well as bring his character to life, since he rarely is shown.  also another challenge the director faces is how to work with the dialogue. During the book, for example when Sherlock and Watson first meet Mr. Sholot, their whole interaction is the three of them cramped into a musty study , whilst Mr. Sholoto tells them of the treasure that is being graded and caused Mary's father to be murderderd, linking the whole story  to the Sign of Four and Shelock Holmes into a deeper mystery. I fell it would be very boarding as an audience to watch the dialogue. With this being said the author must then choose do I show the scene of the treasure, and how it is hidden in a completely new scene ? Do I have the scene start as Holmes and Watson visualizing the scene in front of them as a small semitransparent scene unfolding becoming clearer as Holmes is putting the scene together in his head? Or do I just cut to a new scene with Sholot as a beginning over voice? All of these things will need to be analyzed and changed by the director to better adapt the book into a movie. With this being said I find this scene very essential to be kept because it illustrates the possible reason for the crime, due to. The treasure being hidden in this scene and even Sholot, goes into details of how Mary's father died. Which is the begging mystery of this case ( those as this scene illustrates her fathers death becomes the least of their worries.)   I also find they need to keep the scene where Sherlock is investigating Mr. Sholot,s brothers death, because the clues come to be very important to the case and if the directer were to cut out the scene then people would be wondering how his solving of the crime came to be. However right after he investigates the death,Sherlock finds a trail of ash that he believes can lead to the killer.He then sends Watson of to get a dog from a near by shop and Take Miss. Mary home . I felt the whole scene if put in a movie to be very long and a bit out of order if I was the director of the film I would cut out the scene of Watson getting the dog leading it to be that the police arrived with one and they happened to use it to track the killer. The whole back story to. Me. Just seemed useless . as for the scene with taking Miss. Mary home, I fell that it should be kept,for the sack of romance so that girls are attracted to enjoy the movie, and that it adds a bit lighter side to the story line, instead of just dark rainy and gruesome mysteries.  Though with the deletion of Watson getting the Dog and now having no excuse to take Mary home I fell that as a director I would have him take her home before the investigated the murder after they found the body though. So that as an audience we get a break from the murder, and have the mystery of what will be found at the crime scene, knowing that smoothing important must be there if the director would cause a break.

Watson taking Mary home:

Reflection 5

I really don’t pay attention to the book, when I am looking for a book, it is usually because someone recommended it to me or I googled it. The things I only pay attention to when, it comes to book covers is spine art and the back of the book. The spine is the most important thing for me; it tells me everything I need to know about the book. It allows me to see the length of the book (by how fat or skinny it is) the font of the letters combined with color gives me the tone of the book. Some books have a small simple picture or item with the title of the book that makes me wonder why was that put there? What is the significance of it? As for the back of the book the reason it is significant is after choosing my book the first thing I do is look at the back of it. I always am looking for a synopsis of the book, if it’s in the jacket that bothers me. The reason is because most books with synopsis on the jacket are there because the back is filled with commentary about the book. Having commentary annoys me, it shows me the author cares more about peoples impression of the book than the book its self, they want you to buy off the fact that some one important likes the book not that their book is just a good book. If a book has a synopsis and little commentary then that is a book for me. So if you want me to read your book, then make a nice spine and put the synopsis on the back and I will possibly buy it.

The Hungergames trilogy spines:

 

 

The Top Best and Worst Book Adaptations of All Time :

Best :

Hunger Games

This beloved book adored by teens all around, it has everything fighting, a heroine and a great plot line. However what makes this book the best Adaptation is the way the characters and setting is incorporated into the movie scene. The characters were well casted with the majority of the cast being how I pictured them to be. The scenery and setting was hard to picture it was gloomy, but with hope and the time was a post-apocalyptic America, with each city having different resources, they scenery in each place and the arena was extremely hard to picture, and the director took what I personally saw and put it on screen.

Worst :

Twilight saga

This movie frequently gets bashed, but it’s the acting that makes it so bad. The book holds the main character Bella swan to be this complex girl whose thoughts translate her emotion and what’s going on in the world beautifully. However the cast was poorly casted having her be some mentioned thinking girl, that nobody (the viewers) likes. Also the dialogue is very rough and harsh between Bella and Edward in the book, making their romance just seem weird, however in the book the dialogue has more of a flow to it.

Best :

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban.

This movie really brought the adventure of harry potter in a great light, the way the magical double decker was perceived, in the beginning of the book, was extremely hard to picture while reading it, however the movie greatly visualized what J.K. Rowling was trying to show. Also the boggar lesson was extremely funny it showed the fun side of magic and the hilarity of the scene that the book was unable to show. Also with added music and looks of terror on the students face made magic of morphing something scary into something

Worst : Lemony Snickets Series of Unfortunate Events.

The Books had a lot of fun information, like pages going on and on with one word, interrupted side commentary that helped you enjoy the book even more. However the Movie just plane out stunk it was rushed, there was three books, which took you six hours each book to read, all condensed into a two hour movie. Like that is just crazy! This Was the All time worst adaptation for me.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=doxxfXqpKYA